<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minesweeper or Mindsweeper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/</link>
	<description>Welcome to Little Bo Beep, a site for news and discussion of gaming, science fiction, and the creative ramblings of the overeducated and underemployed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Simurgh</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Simurgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Situations with true logical 50/50 chances, independent of other board constellations, should have 50% win/lose results. Still I have the dumb feeling that I hit a mine in at least 90% of these cases, as if the probability wasn&#039;t 50% at all, and the game was programmed to cheat. However, this seems to happen only as long as I have not yet marked recognizable mines elsewhere (though completely unconnected). Only if there is nothing left than guesses everywhere, logical 50% chances may be actual 50% chances. Programming flaw? Any research done on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Situations with true logical 50/50 chances, independent of other board constellations, should have 50% win/lose results. Still I have the dumb feeling that I hit a mine in at least 90% of these cases, as if the probability wasn&#8217;t 50% at all, and the game was programmed to cheat. However, this seems to happen only as long as I have not yet marked recognizable mines elsewhere (though completely unconnected). Only if there is nothing left than guesses everywhere, logical 50% chances may be actual 50% chances. Programming flaw? Any research done on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Cale.</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Cale.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-401</guid>
		<description>5am term-paper procrastination afterthought: 

The same principles are at play even in strategic gameplay responsive to a dynamic environment... Starcraft has become a ridiculous example of the effectiveness of zen-zoning.
 
A high enough APM rate can, in a lot of instances, demonstrate one&#039;s bypassing their speed of logical decision-making and execution. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNEpSaqsFE0
(Hit the 3:00 mark to avoid a lot of sadness.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5am term-paper procrastination afterthought: </p>
<p>The same principles are at play even in strategic gameplay responsive to a dynamic environment&#8230; Starcraft has become a ridiculous example of the effectiveness of zen-zoning.</p>
<p>A high enough APM rate can, in a lot of instances, demonstrate one&#8217;s bypassing their speed of logical decision-making and execution. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNEpSaqsFE0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNEpSaqsFE0</a><br />
(Hit the 3:00 mark to avoid a lot of sadness.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Cale.</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Cale.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m peached to see that my beloved (and only) method of playing mindsweeper is legitimate! I&#039;ve applied the same frantic button-mashing to a countless number of fighting games.

Sadly, my rabies cum zen approach doesn&#039;t apply well to military tactics or academic work. 

(On revision: without italics in the right place, &quot;rabies cum zen&quot; looks like the title of a poorly translated Japanese horror flick...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m peached to see that my beloved (and only) method of playing mindsweeper is legitimate! I&#8217;ve applied the same frantic button-mashing to a countless number of fighting games.</p>
<p>Sadly, my rabies cum zen approach doesn&#8217;t apply well to military tactics or academic work. </p>
<p>(On revision: without italics in the right place, &#8220;rabies cum zen&#8221; looks like the title of a poorly translated Japanese horror flick&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daytown</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>daytown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-388</guid>
		<description>you absolutely captured the infuriating design of that god-damned game.  well done, and fuck minesweeper, killer of my time, mind and soul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you absolutely captured the infuriating design of that god-damned game.  well done, and fuck minesweeper, killer of my time, mind and soul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-387</guid>
		<description>And I swear I didn&#039;t think anyone would actually read it! Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I swear I didn&#8217;t think anyone would actually read it! Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barkus</title>
		<link>http://littlebobeep.com/2010/minesweeper-or-mindsweeper/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Barkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littlebobeep.com/?p=3507#comment-386</guid>
		<description>you commentated an entire game of expert minesweeper!  meh, beats watching the world cup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you commentated an entire game of expert minesweeper!  meh, beats watching the world cup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

